QMAG vs VOO
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QMAG or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QMAG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $80M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 10 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.71% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.33% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4%Best | 12.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $12,844 | $13,973Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 16, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 19, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.1 years).
QMAG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QMAG vs VOO Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August (QMAG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QMAG returned +12.33% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, QMAG is up 8.71% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 7.4% for QMAG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for QMAG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QMAG charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QMAG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QMAG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QMAG or VOO?
QMAG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QMAG or VOO?
Over the past year QMAG returned +12.33% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QMAG annualized +12.66% vs +17.27% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QMAG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 7.4% for QMAG. Worst drawdown: QMAG -12.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both QMAG and VOO?
QMAG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QMAG or VOO?
QMAG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QMAG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.