QQQ vs RJVI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RJVI?
Large Cap Growth against Allocation/Balanced.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RJVI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.51% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.69% |
| Holdings | 107 | 79 |
| YTD Return | +21.16%Best | -0.25% |
| 1Y Return | +24.78%Best | +0.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.95% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Raymond James Financial, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 2, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs RJVI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RJVI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) is an ETF from Raymond James Financial, Inc.. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.78% while RJVI returned +0.23%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.16% versus a loss of 0.25% for RJVI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RJVI charges 0.51%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $51 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.69% for RJVI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings RJVI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RJVI, our book for it covers 89.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and RJVI share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 70 in RJVI, against full books of 107 and 79.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RJVI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RJVI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RJVI charges 0.51%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RJVI?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.78% vs +0.23% for RJVI, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RJVI?
At least 2.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings RJVI also owns. Our book for RJVI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 70 in RJVI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RJVI?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RJVI yields 3.69%, so RJVI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RJVI better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.