QQQ vs RSPG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RSPG delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSPG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $597M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.99% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 24 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | +37.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.22% | +47.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +15.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.34% | +25.85% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 31.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -82.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 1, 2006 |
QQQ vs RSPG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% while RSPG returned +47.15%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.19% versus a gain of 37.97% for RSPG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.47% per year against +15.88% for RSPG; over five years the annualized figures are +14.34% and +25.85% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -82.1% for RSPG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSPG charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $40 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.99% for RSPG.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSPG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSPG charges 0.40%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSPG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% vs +47.15% for RSPG, so RSPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs +4.98% for RSPG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSPG?
RSPG has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSPG -82.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSPG?
QQQ and RSPG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSPG?
QQQ and RSPG share 2 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 122 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSPG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RSPG yields 1.99%, so RSPG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.