QQQ vs SCDV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SCDV?
Large Cap Growth against Small Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SCDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $486.1B | $153M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 107 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +17.54%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | +25.59%Best | +9.15% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.18% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8%Tie | -22.8%Tie |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,709Best | $10,888 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 50.0% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Bahl & Gaynor |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 11, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.7 years).
QQQ vs SCDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SCDV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% while SCDV returned +9.15%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.54% versus a gain of 11.57% for SCDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 14.4% for SCDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -22.8% for SCDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SCDV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $70 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.44% for SCDV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 35 in SCDV, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 35 in SCDV, against full books of 107 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 34 positions for SCDV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (95.3% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in SCDV (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SCDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SCDV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SCDV charges 0.70%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SCDV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% vs +9.15% for SCDV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +20.39% vs +5.13% for SCDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SCDV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 14.4% for SCDV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs SCDV -22.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SCDV?
QQQ and SCDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SCDV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SCDV yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCDV better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.