QQQ vs SLVP
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SLVP?
Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, SLVP over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $978M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 107 | 48 |
| YTD Return | +15.86%Best | +15.59% |
| 1Y Return | +22.63% | +62.91%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.15% | +64.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.16% | +25.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4%Best | 42.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -80.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,390 | $30,689Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 70.8% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 31, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2012 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.6 years).
QQQ vs SLVP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SLVP Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +22.63% while SLVP returned +62.91%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.86% versus a gain of 15.59% for SLVP.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.15% per year against +64.29% for SLVP; over five years the annualized figures are +14.16% and +25.14% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.52% annualized vs +4.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 17.4% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -80.6% for SLVP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SLVP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $39 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.77% for SLVP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 36 in SLVP, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 36 in SLVP, against full books of 107 and 48.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for SLVP that do not appear in our book for QQQ (21.3% of the fund), and 95 for QQQ that do not appear in SLVP (97.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SLVP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SLVP?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SLVP charges 0.39%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SLVP?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.63% vs +62.91% for SLVP, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), QQQ annualized +18.52% vs +4.40% for SLVP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SLVP?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 17.4% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SLVP -80.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SLVP?
QQQ and SLVP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SLVP?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SLVP yields 1.77%, so SLVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SLVP better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, SLVP over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.