QQQ vs TMFM
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TMFM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $120M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | -0.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | -10.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +4.67% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 18.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -31.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 17, 2014 |
QQQ vs TMFM Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while TMFM returned -10.78%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a loss of 0.93% for TMFM.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +4.67% for TMFM. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs -1.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.1% for TMFM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -31.8% for TMFM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TMFM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for TMFM.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TMFM share 5 holdings out of 130 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TMFM?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TMFM charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TMFM?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs -10.78% for TMFM, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs -1.07% for TMFM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TMFM?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.1% for TMFM. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TMFM -31.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TMFM?
QQQ and TMFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TMFM?
QQQ and TMFM share 5 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 130 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TMFM?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TMFM yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.