IVV vs TMFM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or TMFM?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TMFM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $117M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 36 |
| YTD Return | +14.14%Best | -7.15% |
| 1Y Return | +17.30%Best | -13.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04%Best | +2.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8%Best | 18.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -31.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $17,827Best | $8,908 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 46.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 17, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (4.8 years).
IVV vs TMFM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TMFM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is an ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while TMFM returned -13.86%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a loss of 7.15% for TMFM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.04% per year against +2.46% for TMFM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -31.8% for TMFM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TMFM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TMFM.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of IVV's money is in holdings TMFM also owns. 46.5% of TMFM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in TMFM, against full books of 508 and 36.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for TMFM that do not appear in our book for IVV (49.5% of the fund), and 469 for IVV that do not appear in TMFM (98.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TMFM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DXCMDexcom Inc. | 0.05% | 5.89% | 5.84% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 0.07% | 4.47% | 4.40% |
| TYLTyler Technologies Inc | 0.02% | 4.31% | 4.29% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 0.03% | 4.26% | 4.23% |
| BROBrown & Brown Inc | 0.03% | 3.94% | 3.91% |
| WATWaters Corp. | 0.06% | 3.84% | 3.78% |
| SBACSba Communications Corp. Class A Real Estate Investment Tru | 0.03% | 3.86% | 3.83% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 0.08% | 3.70% | 3.62% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.12% | 3.54% | 3.42% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 0.09% | 2.44% | 2.35% |
46.5% of TMFM is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TMFM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TMFM charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TMFM?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs -13.86% for TMFM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TMFM?
TMFM has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs TMFM -31.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TMFM?
IVV and TMFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TMFM?
46.5% of TMFM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 46.5% of TMFM's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in TMFM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TMFM?
IVV yields 1.06% while TMFM yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TMFM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.