IVV vs TMFM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TMFM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $113M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +0.09% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | -8.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +4.21% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -31.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 17, 2014 |
IVV vs TMFM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while TMFM returned -8.65%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 0.09% for TMFM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +4.21% for TMFM. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -31.8% for TMFM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TMFM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for TMFM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TMFM share 13 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TMFM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TMFM charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TMFM?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs -8.65% for TMFM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -0.86% for TMFM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TMFM?
TMFM has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TMFM -31.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TMFM?
IVV and TMFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TMFM?
IVV and TMFM share 13 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TMFM?
IVV yields 1.09% while TMFM yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.