TMFM vs VXUS
Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMFM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $113M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.09% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | -8.65% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.21% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Motley Fool Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 17, 2014 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TMFM vs VXUS Performance
Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMFM returned -8.65% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, TMFM is up 0.09% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, TMFM compounded at +4.21% per year against +19.53% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.8% for TMFM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMFM charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMFM currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TMFM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7894 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMFM or VXUS?
TMFM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TMFM or VXUS?
Over the past year TMFM returned -8.65% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), TMFM annualized -0.86% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TMFM or VXUS?
TMFM has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: TMFM -31.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TMFM and VXUS?
TMFM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TMFM and VXUS?
TMFM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMFM or VXUS?
TMFM yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.