QQQ vs WBIF
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WBIF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.65% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $24M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.06% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 70 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +19.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +25.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +10.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +4.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 12.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -20.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 25, 2014 |
QQQ vs WBIF Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while WBIF returned +25.42%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 19.20% for WBIF.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +10.72% for WBIF; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +4.12% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.0% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $165 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.06% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WBIF share 8 holdings out of 163 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WBIF?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WBIF charges 1.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WBIF?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +25.42% for WBIF, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +4.27% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WBIF?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.0% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WBIF?
QQQ and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WBIF?
QQQ and WBIF share 8 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 163 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WBIF?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WBIF yields 0.06%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.