QQQ vs WBIL
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WBIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.55% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $31M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.04% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +15.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +24.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +11.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | +5.97% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 11.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 25, 2014 |
QQQ vs WBIL Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while WBIL returned +24.94%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 15.66% for WBIL.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +11.17% for WBIL; over five years the annualized figures are +14.78% and +5.97% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.9% for WBIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -25.3% for WBIL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WBIL charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $155 annually, a gap of $137 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.04% for WBIL.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WBIL share 18 holdings out of 146 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WBIL?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WBIL charges 1.55%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $137 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WBIL?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +24.94% for WBIL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +4.71% for WBIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WBIL?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.9% for WBIL. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WBIL -25.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WBIL?
QQQ and WBIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WBIL?
QQQ and WBIL share 18 common holdings with a 11.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 146 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WBIL?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WBIL yields 0.04%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.