QQQ vs WBIL
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
Which is better, QQQ or WBIL?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIL is less concentrated, with 21.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.55% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 107 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +21.18%Best | +14.59% |
| 1Y Return | +24.36%Best | +16.30% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.99%Best | +11.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39%Best | +6.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -25.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,457Best | $13,630 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 21.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2014 to Sep 23, 2026 (12.1 years).
QQQ vs WBIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.1 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs WBIL Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.36% while WBIL returned +16.30%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.18% versus a gain of 14.59% for WBIL.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +27.99% per year against +11.24% for WBIL; over five years the annualized figures are +15.39% and +6.39% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.41% annualized vs +4.59%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 11.9% for WBIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -25.3% for WBIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WBIL charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $155 annually, a gap of $137 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.04% for WBIL.
Holdings Overlap
16.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings WBIL also owns. 27.1% of WBIL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
WBIL and QQQ share little of their money.
18 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 69 in WBIL, against full books of 107 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 49 positions for WBIL that do not appear in our book for QQQ (66.8% of the fund), and 78 for QQQ that do not appear in WBIL (80.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in WBIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 2.03% | 2.40% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 1.62% | 1.54% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.30% | 1.46% | 0.16% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.97% | 1.60% | 0.63% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.72% | 1.82% | 1.10% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.73% | 1.67% | 0.94% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 0.37% | 1.82% | 1.45% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 0.28% | 1.85% | 1.57% |
| ALABAstera Labs Inc - Common | 0.24% | 1.89% | 1.65% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.60% | 0.46% | 1.14% |
27.1% of WBIL is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WBIL?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WBIL charges 1.55%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $137 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or WBIL?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.36% vs +16.30% for WBIL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +18.41% vs +4.59% for WBIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WBIL?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 11.9% for WBIL. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WBIL -25.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WBIL?
QQQ and WBIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WBIL?
27.1% of WBIL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 27.1% of WBIL's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 69 in WBIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WBIL?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WBIL yields 0.04%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIL better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIL is less concentrated, with 21.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.