IVV vs WBIL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. WBIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WBIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.55% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $31M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.04% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +19.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +27.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +12.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +6.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 25, 2014 |
IVV vs WBIL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while WBIL returned +27.53%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 19.29% for WBIL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +12.26% for WBIL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +6.33% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.0% for WBIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.3% for WBIL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WBIL charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $155 annually, a gap of $152 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.04% for WBIL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WBIL share 52 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WBIL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WBIL charges 1.55%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $152 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WBIL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +27.53% for WBIL, so WBIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +4.98% for WBIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WBIL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.0% for WBIL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WBIL -25.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and WBIL?
IVV and WBIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WBIL?
IVV and WBIL share 52 common holdings with a 14.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WBIL?
IVV yields 1.10% while WBIL yields 0.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.