IVV vs WBIL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
Which is better, IVV or WBIL?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIL is less concentrated, with 21.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.55% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 508 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +13.85% | +14.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.57%Best | +18.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.50%Best | +11.61% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34%Best | +6.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -25.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,703Best | $13,579 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 21.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2014 to Sep 25, 2026 (12.1 years).
IVV vs WBIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WBIL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% while WBIL returned +18.25%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.85% versus a gain of 14.11% for WBIL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.50% per year against +11.61% for WBIL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +6.31% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.53% annualized vs +4.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 11.9% for WBIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -25.3% for WBIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WBIL charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $155 annually, a gap of $152 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.04% for WBIL.
Holdings Overlap
16.4% of IVV's money is in holdings WBIL also owns. 75.7% of WBIL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of WBIL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
57 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 69 in WBIL, against full books of 508 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for WBIL that do not appear in our book for IVV (18.2% of the fund), and 425 for IVV that do not appear in WBIL (82.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WBIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 1.62% | 1.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 2.03% | 0.40% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 0.20% | 2.24% | 2.04% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 0.06% | 2.23% | 2.17% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.29% | 1.93% | 1.64% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.52% | 1.66% | 1.14% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.30% | 1.88% | 1.58% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.53% | 1.64% | 1.11% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 0.78% | 0.60% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 0.42% | 1.74% | 1.32% |
75.7% of WBIL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WBIL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WBIL charges 1.55%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $152 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WBIL?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% vs +18.25% for WBIL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +12.53% vs +4.55% for WBIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WBIL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 11.9% for WBIL. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs WBIL -25.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and WBIL?
IVV and WBIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WBIL?
75.7% of WBIL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 75.7% of WBIL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 57 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 69 in WBIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WBIL?
IVV yields 1.06% while WBIL yields 0.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIL is less concentrated, with 21.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.