QQQ vs WEAT
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Teucrium Wheat Fund ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WEAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $295M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 29 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +26.90% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +20.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | -6.20% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | -6.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 23.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -84.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Teucrium | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 19, 2011 |
QQQ vs WEAT Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Teucrium Wheat Fund ETF (WEAT) is a ETF from Teucrium. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while WEAT returned +20.00%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 26.90% for WEAT.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against -6.20% for WEAT; over five years the annualized figures are +14.78% and -6.44% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs -10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 23.1% for WEAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -84.3% for WEAT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WEAT charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $100 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for WEAT.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WEAT share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WEAT?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WEAT charges 1.00%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WEAT?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +20.00% for WEAT, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs -10.03% for WEAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WEAT?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 23.1% for WEAT. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WEAT -84.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WEAT?
QQQ and WEAT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WEAT?
QQQ and WEAT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WEAT?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WEAT yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.