QQQ vs XUSM
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs MarketDesk International Momentum ETF
Which is better, QQQ or XUSM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. XUSM is less concentrated, with 23.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XUSM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +16.16%Best | -4.42% |
| 1Y Return | +18.86% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.46% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7% | 23.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 15, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs XUSM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs XUSM Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and MarketDesk International Momentum ETF (XUSM) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.16% versus a loss of 4.42% for XUSM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XUSM charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for XUSM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 51 in XUSM, totalling 99.6% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 51 in XUSM, against full books of 321 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for XUSM that do not appear in our book for QQQ (9.9% of the fund), and 94 for QQQ that do not appear in XUSM (97.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and XUSM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XUSM?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XUSM charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XUSM?
QQQ yields 0.42% while XUSM yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XUSM better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. XUSM is less concentrated, with 23.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.