QQQ vs ZAP
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, QQQ or ZAP?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. ZAP is less concentrated, with 42.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $453M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 107 | 47 |
| YTD Return | +16.87%Best | +8.38% |
| 1Y Return | +22.98%Best | +13.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.98% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.39% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -11.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,886Best | $13,701 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 42.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.7 years).
QQQ vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs ZAP Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% while ZAP returned +13.82%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.87% versus a gain of 8.38% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.3% for ZAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -11.9% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $50 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings ZAP also owns. 15.5% of ZAP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
ZAP and QQQ share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 107 and 47.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 40 positions for ZAP that do not appear in our book for QQQ (82.7% of the fund), and 91 for QQQ that do not appear in ZAP (95.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and ZAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ZAP?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ZAP charges 0.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or ZAP?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% vs +13.82% for ZAP, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +21.30% vs +20.35% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ZAP?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.3% for ZAP. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs ZAP -11.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ZAP?
QQQ and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ZAP?
15.5% of ZAP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 15.5% of ZAP's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 45 in ZAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ZAP?
QQQ yields 0.44% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. ZAP is less concentrated, with 42.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.