VYM vs ZAP
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, VYM or ZAP?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $81.6B | $453M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.22% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 613 | 47 |
| YTD Return | +13.15%Best | +7.53% |
| 1Y Return | +17.82%Best | +13.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.99% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.16% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.7%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5% | -11.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,257 | $13,603Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.9%Best | 42.4% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.7 years).
VYM vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
VYM vs ZAP Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year VYM returned +17.82% while ZAP returned +13.69%. Year to date, VYM is up 13.15% versus a gain of 7.53% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for VYM and -11.9% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $50 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.22% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
4.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ZAP also owns. 68.2% of ZAP's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 613 and 47.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for ZAP that do not appear in our book for VYM (30.0% of the fund), and 542 for VYM that do not appear in ZAP (92.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VYM | Weight in ZAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETNEaton Corp. Plc | 0.69% | 4.45% | 3.76% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.25% | 4.53% | 4.28% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc. | 0.76% | 3.87% | 3.11% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 0.45% | 4.01% | 3.56% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp. | 0.41% | 3.96% | 3.55% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co. Inc. | 0.31% | 3.92% | 3.61% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc. | 0.17% | 4.01% | 3.84% |
| EXCExelon Corp. | 0.20% | 3.98% | 3.78% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 0.21% | 3.90% | 3.69% |
| ETREntergy Corp. | 0.22% | 3.83% | 3.61% |
68.2% of ZAP is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or ZAP?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while ZAP charges 0.50%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VYM or ZAP?
Over the past year VYM returned +17.82% vs +13.69% for ZAP, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VYM annualized +18.04% vs +19.84% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VYM or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -14.5% vs ZAP -11.9%.
Should I hold both VYM and ZAP?
VYM and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and ZAP?
68.2% of ZAP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 68.2% of ZAP's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 45 in ZAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or ZAP?
VYM yields 2.22% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.