QQQ vs ZIG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ZIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.75% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 33 | |
| YTD Return | +19.32% | +10.04% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.08% | +9.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.54% | +10.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.51% | +8.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 20.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -37.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Acquirers Funds, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 14, 2019 |
QQQ vs ZIG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is a ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.08% while ZIG returned +9.56%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.32% versus a gain of 10.04% for ZIG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +27.54% per year against +10.64% for ZIG; over five years the annualized figures are +15.51% and +8.33% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.13% annualized vs +7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.1% for ZIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -37.1% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.75% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ZIG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ZIG charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or ZIG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.08% vs +9.56% for ZIG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQ annualized +13.13% vs +7.77% for ZIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ZIG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.1% for ZIG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs ZIG -37.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ZIG?
QQQ and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ZIG?
QQQ and ZIG share 2 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 133 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ZIG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while ZIG yields 1.75%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.