QQQJ vs VTI
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQJ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +22.83% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.03% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.77% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.25% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
QQQJ vs VTI Performance
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQJ returned +36.03% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QQQJ is up 22.83% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QQQJ compounded at +22.77% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.25% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQJ has the edge at +10.47% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for QQQJ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQJ charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQJ currently yields 0.56% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQJ and VTI share 78 holdings out of 2814 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQJ or VTI?
QQQJ has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQJ or VTI?
Over the past year QQQJ returned +36.03% vs +22.35% for VTI, so QQQJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QQQJ annualized +10.47% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQJ or VTI?
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQJ -39.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQQJ and VTI?
QQQJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQJ and VTI?
QQQJ and VTI share 78 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2814 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQJ or VTI?
QQQJ yields 0.56% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.