QQQJ vs VTI
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QQQJ or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQJ led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QQQJ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQJ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 107 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +18.44%Best | +12.08% |
| 1Y Return | +25.06%Best | +16.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.67%Best | +20.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.17% | +11.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,490 | $17,537Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.6%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2020 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.9 years).
QQQJ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
QQQJ vs VTI Performance
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQJ returned +25.06% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, QQQJ is up 18.44% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, QQQJ compounded at +21.67% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.17% and +11.89% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.77% annualized vs +9.67%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for QQQJ and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQJ charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQJ currently yields 0.54% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
85.8% of QQQJ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.1% of VTI's money is in holdings QQQJ also owns.
Most of QQQJ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
87 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in QQQJ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 107 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,073 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QQQJ (95.4% of the fund), and 4 for QQQJ that do not appear in VTI (2.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQJ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBAYEbay Inc. | 2.27% | 0.07% | 2.20% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 2.27% | 0.05% | 2.22% |
| RVMDRevolution Medicines Inc | 2.15% | 0.05% | 2.10% |
| CRDO:KYCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 2.05% | 0.05% | 2.00% |
| FLEX:SIFlex Ltd | 1.97% | 0.06% | 1.91% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 1.80% | 0.05% | 1.75% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary) | 1.79% | 0.05% | 1.74% |
| MDBMongodb, Inc. | 1.79% | 0.04% | 1.75% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 1.76% | 0.05% | 1.71% |
| UALUnited Airlines Holdings Inc. | 1.72% | 0.05% | 1.67% |
85.8% of QQQJ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQJ or VTI?
QQQJ has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQJ or VTI?
Over the past year QQQJ returned +25.06% vs +16.31% for VTI, so QQQJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QQQJ annualized +9.67% vs +14.77% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQJ or VTI?
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQJ -39.6% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both QQQJ and VTI?
QQQJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQJ and VTI?
85.8% of QQQJ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.1% of VTI's is in holdings QQQJ also owns. They hold 87 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in QQQJ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQJ or VTI?
QQQJ yields 0.54% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QQQJ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQJ led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QQQJ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.