QQQJ vs VYM
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QQQJ or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQJ led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. QQQJ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQJ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 107 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +17.88%Best | +12.87% |
| 1Y Return | +24.47%Best | +17.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.70%Best | +17.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.99% | +11.98%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,376 | $17,608Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.6%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2020 to Sep 15, 2026 (5.9 years).
QQQJ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
QQQJ vs VYM Performance
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQJ returned +24.47% while VYM returned +17.25%. Year to date, QQQJ is up 17.88% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.
Over three years, QQQJ compounded at +21.70% per year against +17.66% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.99% and +11.98% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +14.71% annualized vs +9.58%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 13.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for QQQJ and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQJ charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQJ currently yields 0.54% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
18.1% of QQQJ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.4% of VYM's money is in holdings QQQJ also owns.
QQQJ and VYM share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in QQQJ and 557 in VYM, against full books of 107 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 512 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QQQJ (95.7% of the fund), and 72 for QQQJ that do not appear in VYM (64.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQJ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBAYEbay Inc. | 2.27% | 0.21% | 2.06% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 1.80% | 0.14% | 1.66% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 1.76% | 0.15% | 1.61% |
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 1.50% | 0.11% | 1.39% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 1.29% | 0.10% | 1.19% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corp | 1.16% | 0.09% | 1.07% |
| SSNCSs&C Technologies Holdings Inc. | 0.98% | 0.06% | 0.92% |
| CDWCDW Corporation | 0.95% | 0.08% | 0.87% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 0.93% | 0.08% | 0.85% |
| GENGen Digital Inc | 0.92% | 0.06% | 0.86% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQJ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQJ or VYM?
QQQJ has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQJ or VYM?
Over the past year QQQJ returned +24.47% vs +17.25% for VYM, so QQQJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QQQJ annualized +9.58% vs +14.71% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQJ or VYM?
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 13.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQQJ -39.6% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both QQQJ and VYM?
QQQJ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQJ and VYM?
18.1% of QQQJ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.4% of VYM's is in holdings QQQJ also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in QQQJ and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQJ or VYM?
QQQJ yields 0.54% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QQQJ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQJ led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. QQQJ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.