QQQJ vs VOO
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQQJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQJ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +22.83% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.03% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.77% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.25% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QQQJ vs VOO Performance
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQJ returned +36.03% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QQQJ is up 22.83% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, QQQJ compounded at +22.77% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.25% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for QQQJ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQJ charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQJ currently yields 0.56% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QQQJ and VOO share 44 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQJ or VOO?
QQQJ has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQJ or VOO?
Over the past year QQQJ returned +36.03% vs +21.87% for VOO, so QQQJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QQQJ annualized +10.47% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQJ or VOO?
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQQJ -39.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQQJ and VOO?
QQQJ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQJ and VOO?
QQQJ and VOO share 44 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQJ or VOO?
QQQJ yields 0.56% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.