QQQJ vs VXUS
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QQQJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQJ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +23.43% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.74% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.94% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QQQJ vs VXUS Performance
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQJ returned +40.74% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, QQQJ is up 23.43% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, QQQJ compounded at +21.94% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.38% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQJ has the edge at +10.61% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for QQQJ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQJ charges 0.15% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $5 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQJ currently yields 0.54% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QQQJ and VXUS share 7 holdings out of 7959 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQJ or VXUS?
QQQJ has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQJ or VXUS?
Over the past year QQQJ returned +40.74% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so QQQJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QQQJ annualized +10.61% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQJ or VXUS?
QQQJ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QQQJ -39.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QQQJ and VXUS?
QQQJ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQJ and VXUS?
QQQJ and VXUS share 7 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7959 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQJ or VXUS?
QQQJ yields 0.54% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.