QSPT vs SPY

QSPT vs SPY

Which is better, QSPT or SPY?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. QSPT led over 1Y, SPY over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQSPTSPY
Expense Ratio0.90%0.09%Best
AUM$646M$804.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.98%
Holdings10505
YTD Return+13.22%Best+10.96%
1Y Return+15.78%Best+15.52%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.39%+20.73%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+12.38%+12.53%Best
Volatility (annualized)13.4%Best15.7%
Max Drawdown-22.6%Best-24.5%
$10,000 over 5 years$17,924$18,044Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 17, 2021Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2021 to Sep 16, 2026 (5 years).

QSPT vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.

QSPT vs SPY Performance

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September (QSPT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year QSPT returned +15.78% while SPY returned +15.52%. Year to date, QSPT is up 13.22% versus a gain of 10.96% for SPY.

Over three years, QSPT compounded at +17.39% per year against +20.73% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +12.38% and +12.53% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 13.4% for QSPT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QSPT and -24.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QSPT charges 0.90% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $9 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSPT currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QSPT and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QSPTSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QSPT or SPY?

QSPT has an expense ratio of 0.90% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QSPT or SPY?

Over the past year QSPT returned +15.78% vs +15.52% for SPY, so QSPT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QSPT or SPY?

SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 13.4% for QSPT. Worst drawdown: QSPT -22.6% vs SPY -24.5%.

Should I hold both QSPT and SPY?

QSPT and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QSPT or SPY?

QSPT yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than QSPT?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. QSPT led over 1Y, SPY over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.