QSPT vs VOO
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSPT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $620M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.64% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.35% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.80% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.32% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 17, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QSPT vs VOO Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September (QSPT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QSPT returned +16.35% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, QSPT is up 11.64% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, QSPT compounded at +17.80% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.32% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.5% for QSPT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QSPT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSPT charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSPT currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QSPT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSPT or VOO?
QSPT has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QSPT or VOO?
Over the past year QSPT returned +16.35% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QSPT annualized +12.32% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QSPT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.5% for QSPT. Worst drawdown: QSPT -22.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QSPT and VOO?
QSPT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QSPT and VOO?
QSPT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSPT or VOO?
QSPT yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.