QSPT vs SCHD
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSPT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $620M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +11.65% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.36% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.02% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.33% | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 17, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
QSPT vs SCHD Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September (QSPT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QSPT returned +16.36% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, QSPT is up 11.65% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, QSPT compounded at +18.02% per year against +15.40% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +12.33% and +9.70% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QSPT has the edge at +12.33% annualized vs +11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 13.5% for QSPT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QSPT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSPT charges 0.90% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $6 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSPT currently yields 0.00% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
QSPT and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSPT or SCHD?
QSPT has an expense ratio of 0.90% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QSPT or SCHD?
Over the past year QSPT returned +16.36% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QSPT annualized +12.33% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QSPT or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 13.5% for QSPT. Worst drawdown: QSPT -22.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both QSPT and SCHD?
QSPT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QSPT and SCHD?
QSPT and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSPT or SCHD?
QSPT yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.