RBIL vs VTI
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RBIL or VTI?
Inflation Protection against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RBIL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $153M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.04% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.64% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.32% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.0%Best | 13.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.6%Best | -16.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $10,630 | $13,138Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | US Benchmark Series | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Inflation Protection | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 25, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.6 years).
RBIL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
RBIL vs VTI Performance
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is an ETF from US Benchmark Series and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RBIL returned +3.32% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, RBIL is up 2.64% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 1.0% for RBIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.6% for RBIL and -16.5% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RBIL charges 0.17% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $3 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RBIL currently yields 4.04% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in RBIL and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.9% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in RBIL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 6 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RBIL (97.5% of the fund), and 5 for RBIL that do not appear in VTI (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RBIL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RBIL or VTI?
RBIL has an expense ratio of 0.17% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RBIL or VTI?
Over the past year RBIL returned +3.32% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RBIL annualized +3.89% vs +18.60% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RBIL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 1.0% for RBIL. Worst drawdown: RBIL -0.6% vs VTI -16.5%.
Should I hold both RBIL and VTI?
RBIL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RBIL or VTI?
RBIL yields 4.04% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RBIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RBIL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.