RBLD vs VTI
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RBLD or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RBLD is less concentrated, with 12.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RBLD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $42M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 104 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.24% | +11.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.89% | +15.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.80% | +20.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $17,679 | $19,096Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.2%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2022 to Sep 15, 2026 (4.1 years).
RBLD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
RBLD vs VTI Performance
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RBLD returned +12.89% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, RBLD is up 10.24% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, RBLD compounded at +17.80% per year against +20.67% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +17.09% annualized vs +14.91%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RBLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for RBLD and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RBLD charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RBLD currently yields 0.98% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.7% of RBLD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 7.8% of VTI's money is in holdings RBLD also owns.
Most of RBLD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
100 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in RBLD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 104 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,052 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RBLD (89.7% of the fund), and 0 for RBLD that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RBLD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 1.32% | 0.10% | 1.22% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 1.29% | 0.12% | 1.17% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 1.28% | 0.13% | 1.15% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.36% |
| MDBMongodb, Inc. | 1.29% | 0.04% | 1.25% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 1.09% | 0.24% | 0.85% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 1.15% | 0.12% | 1.03% |
| MMM3M Company | 1.14% | 0.13% | 1.01% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 1.14% | 0.12% | 1.02% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 1.13% | 0.12% | 1.01% |
99.7% of RBLD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RBLD or VTI?
RBLD has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RBLD or VTI?
Over the past year RBLD returned +12.89% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RBLD annualized +14.91% vs +17.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RBLD or VTI?
RBLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RBLD -19.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RBLD and VTI?
RBLD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RBLD and VTI?
99.7% of RBLD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 7.8% of VTI's is in holdings RBLD also owns. They hold 100 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in RBLD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RBLD or VTI?
RBLD yields 0.98% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RBLD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RBLD is less concentrated, with 12.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.