IVV vs RBLD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF
Which is better, IVV or RBLD?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RBLD is less concentrated, with 12.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RBLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $42M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 508 | 104 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +11.23% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24%Best | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2%Best | 16.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $19,554Best | $17,825 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 12.2%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 13, 2008 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2022 to Sep 17, 2026 (4.1 years).
IVV vs RBLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RBLD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while RBLD returned +15.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 11.23% for RBLD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against +18.12% for RBLD. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +17.77% annualized vs +15.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RBLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.1% for RBLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RBLD charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.98% for RBLD.
Holdings Overlap
7.1% of IVV's money is in holdings RBLD also owns. 78.9% of RBLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RBLD is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
79 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 100 in RBLD, against full books of 508 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for RBLD that do not appear in our book for IVV (18.9% of the fund), and 403 for IVV that do not appear in RBLD (91.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RBLD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 0.14% | 1.32% | 1.18% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 0.16% | 1.29% | 1.13% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.88% | 0.33% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.27% | 1.09% | 0.82% |
| MMM3M Company | 0.14% | 1.14% | 1.00% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 0.13% | 1.14% | 1.01% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.13% | 1.13% | 1.00% |
| PHParker-Hannifin Corp. | 0.19% | 1.06% | 0.87% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 0.10% | 1.15% | 1.05% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 0.09% | 1.16% | 1.07% |
78.9% of RBLD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RBLD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RBLD charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RBLD?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +15.34% for RBLD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +17.77% vs +15.14% for RBLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RBLD?
RBLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs RBLD -19.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and RBLD?
IVV and RBLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RBLD?
78.9% of RBLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 78.9% of RBLD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 79 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 100 in RBLD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RBLD?
IVV yields 1.06% while RBLD yields 0.98%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RBLD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RBLD is less concentrated, with 12.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.