RDFI vs VXUS
RDFI vs VXUS
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RDFI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 4.23% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $84M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.16% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -2.22% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.13% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.30% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.77% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Rareview Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RDFI vs VXUS Performance
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) is a ETF from Rareview Capital and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RDFI returned +1.13% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, RDFI is down 2.22% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, RDFI compounded at +8.30% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.77% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, RDFI has the edge at +5.20% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for RDFI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for RDFI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RDFI charges 4.23% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $423 vs $5 annually, a gap of $418 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RDFI currently yields 8.16% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RDFI and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7894 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RDFI or VXUS?
RDFI has an expense ratio of 4.23% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $418 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RDFI or VXUS?
Over the past year RDFI returned +1.13% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), RDFI annualized +5.20% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RDFI or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for RDFI. Worst drawdown: RDFI -23.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RDFI and VXUS?
RDFI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RDFI and VXUS?
RDFI and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RDFI or VXUS?
RDFI yields 8.16% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RDFI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.