RECS vs SCHD
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, RECS or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RECS led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. RECS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RECS | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $6.0B | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 368 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +10.40% | +24.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.95% | +27.90%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.68%Best | +15.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.62%Best | +9.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,935Best | $16,083 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.2%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2019 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 25, 2019 to Sep 17, 2026 (14.9 years).
RECS vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
RECS vs SCHD Performance
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RECS returned +15.95% while SCHD returned +27.90%. Year to date, RECS is up 10.40% versus a gain of 24.23% for SCHD.
Over three years, RECS compounded at +21.68% per year against +15.55% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.62% and +9.97% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, RECS has the edge at +16.60% annualized vs +11.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RECS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for RECS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RECS charges 0.15% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $6 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RECS currently yields 1.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
8.8% of RECS's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 31.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings RECS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 349 positions we hold weights for in RECS and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 368 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 77 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for RECS (68.4% of the fund), and 314 for RECS that do not appear in SCHD (88.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RECS | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.58% | 4.02% | 2.44% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.33% | 4.70% | 4.37% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.67% | 3.94% | 3.27% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 1.15% | 3.33% | 2.18% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 1.24% | 2.79% | 1.55% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.85% | 2.79% | 1.94% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 0.55% | 2.31% | 1.76% |
| TGTTarget Corp Common Stock Usd.0833 | 0.72% | 1.78% | 1.06% |
| FFord Motor Credit | 0.51% | 1.33% | 0.82% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.22% | 0.54% | 0.32% |
31.6% of SCHD is already inside RECS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RECS or SCHD?
RECS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RECS or SCHD?
Over the past year RECS returned +15.95% vs +27.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), RECS annualized +16.60% vs +11.30% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RECS or SCHD?
RECS has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RECS -34.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RECS and SCHD?
RECS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RECS and SCHD?
31.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings RECS also owns. 31.6% of SCHD's is in holdings RECS also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 349 positions we hold weights for in RECS and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, RECS or SCHD?
RECS yields 1.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than RECS?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RECS led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. RECS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.