RECS vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRECSVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.15%0.04%
AUM$5.9B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.05%2.86%
Holdings368568
YTD Return+10.57%+15.80%
1Y Return+20.40%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.30%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.77%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)16.5%14.6%
Max Drawdown-34.3%-58.8%
Fund FamilyColumbia Threadneedle InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 25, 2019Nov 10, 2006

RECS vs VYM Performance

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is a ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RECS returned +20.40% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, RECS is up 10.57% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, RECS compounded at +21.30% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.77% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RECS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for RECS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RECS charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RECS currently yields 1.05% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

25.5%overlap

RECS and VYM share 141 holdings out of 777 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RECSWeight in VYMDifference
XOM1.85%2.83%0.98%
PG2.23%1.72%0.51%
WFC1.66%1.12%0.54%
CVXProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CProProPro
MSProProPro
CSCOProProPro
PFEProProPro
UNPProProPro
See all 10 holdings RECS shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RECS or VYM?

RECS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RECS or VYM?

Over the past year RECS returned +20.40% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RECS annualized +4.01% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RECS or VYM?

RECS has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RECS -34.3% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both RECS and VYM?

RECS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RECS and VYM?

RECS and VYM share 141 common holdings with a 25.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 777 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RECS or VYM?

RECS yields 1.05% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →