RFDA vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHDMore Diversified: SCHD

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRFDASCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.52%0.06%
AUM$89M$103.7B
Dividend Yield1.79%3.31%
Holdings79104
YTD Return+16.12%+24.26%
1Y Return+25.69%+31.38%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.05%+15.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.07%+9.72%
Volatility (annualized)15.2%13.6%
Max Drawdown-34.8%-33.4%
Fund FamilyALPS AdvisorsCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 6, 2016Oct 20, 2011

RFDA vs SCHD Performance

ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RFDA returned +25.69% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, RFDA is up 16.12% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.

Over three years, RFDA compounded at +19.05% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.07% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, RFDA has the edge at +12.48% annualized vs +11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RFDA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.8% for RFDA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RFDA charges 0.52% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $6 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RFDA currently yields 1.79% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

19.7%overlap

RFDA and SCHD share 17 holdings out of 161 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RFDAWeight in SCHDDifference
UNH3.08%4.54%1.46%
MRK1.84%4.32%2.48%
COP2.30%3.70%1.40%
KOProProPro
BMYProProPro
VZProProPro
LMTProProPro
MOProProPro
QCOMProProPro
UPSProProPro
See all 10 holdings RFDA shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RFDA or SCHD?

RFDA has an expense ratio of 0.52% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RFDA or SCHD?

Over the past year RFDA returned +25.69% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), RFDA annualized +12.48% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RFDA or SCHD?

RFDA has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RFDA -34.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both RFDA and SCHD?

RFDA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RFDA and SCHD?

RFDA and SCHD share 17 common holdings with a 19.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 161 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RFDA or SCHD?

RFDA yields 1.79% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →