RLTY vs VTI

RLTY vs VTI

Which is better, RLTY or VTI?

Debt-oriented balanced against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRLTYVTI
Expense Ratio1.19%0.03%Best
AUM$265M$690.1B
Dividend Yield7.85%1.03%
Holdings2323,524
YTD Return+0.00%+12.51%Best
1Y Return-2.06%+15.23%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.04%+22.50%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.31%
Volatility (annualized)23.4%15.8%Best
Max Drawdown-35.4%-22.4%Best
$10,000 over 4.6 years$10,303$18,501Best
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleDebt-oriented balancedLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 24, 2022May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 1, 2026 (4.6 years).

RLTY vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.

RLTY vs VTI Performance

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund (RLTY) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RLTY returned -2.06% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, RLTY is up 0.00% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.

Over three years, RLTY compounded at +12.04% per year against +22.50% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for RLTY and -22.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RLTY charges 1.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $119 vs $3 annually, a gap of $116 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RLTY currently yields 7.85% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in RLTY2.0%

At least 2.0% of VTI's money is in holdings RLTY also owns.

Only one direction is shown: for RLTY, our book for it lists positions totalling 138.3% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.

VTI and RLTY share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, RLTY as of Mar 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

33 positions in common, counted across the 168 positions we hold weights for in RLTY and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 232 and 3,524.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RLTYWeight in VTIDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.15.93%0.23%15.70%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.10.68%0.09%10.59%
CCICrown Castle International Corp8.88%0.05%8.83%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation6.07%0.11%5.96%
PLDPrologis Inc5.22%0.19%5.03%
EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust4.05%0.14%3.91%
EXRExtra Space Storage Inc.3.99%0.04%3.95%
IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv3.80%0.05%3.75%
ADCAgree Realty Corp3.36%0.01%3.35%
ELSEquity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.3.18%0.02%3.16%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of RLTY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

RLTYVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RLTY or VTI?

RLTY has an expense ratio of 1.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $116 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, RLTY or VTI?

Over the past year RLTY returned -2.06% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, RLTY or VTI?

RLTY has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RLTY -35.4% vs VTI -22.4%.

Should I hold both RLTY and VTI?

RLTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between RLTY and VTI?

At least 2.0% of VTI's money is in holdings RLTY also owns. Our book for RLTY is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 168 positions we hold weights for in RLTY and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RLTY or VTI?

RLTY yields 7.85% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RLTY?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.