RMRC vs VOO
ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RMRC or VOO?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RMRC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 12 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +1.98% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.03% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Top 10 Weight | 94.0% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Armor ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RMRC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RMRC vs VOO Performance
ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) is an ETF from Armor ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RMRC is up 1.98% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RMRC charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RMRC currently yields 0.58% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 11 holdings in RMRC and 494 in VOO, totalling 99.8% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in RMRC and 494 in VOO, against full books of 12 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 11 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 487 positions RMRC does not, 99.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RMRC and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RMRC or VOO?
RMRC has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, RMRC or VOO?
RMRC yields 0.58% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RMRC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.