RSBY vs VTI
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSBY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.78% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.41% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.88% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Return Stacked ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
RSBY vs VTI Performance
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) is a ETF from Return Stacked ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSBY returned +12.88% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RSBY is up 17.41% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.8% for RSBY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.4% for RSBY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSBY charges 1.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSBY currently yields 1.78% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RSBY and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSBY or VTI?
RSBY has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSBY or VTI?
Over the past year RSBY returned +12.88% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSBY annualized -4.25% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSBY or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.8% for RSBY. Worst drawdown: RSBY -23.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSBY and VTI?
RSBY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSBY and VTI?
RSBY and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSBY or VTI?
RSBY yields 1.78% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RSBY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.