RSBY vs VOO
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSBY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.78% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.07% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.80% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Return Stacked ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RSBY vs VOO Performance
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) is a ETF from Return Stacked ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSBY returned +12.80% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, RSBY is up 18.07% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.9% for RSBY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.4% for RSBY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSBY charges 1.01% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSBY currently yields 1.78% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RSBY and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSBY or VOO?
RSBY has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSBY or VOO?
Over the past year RSBY returned +12.80% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSBY annualized -3.99% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSBY or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.9% for RSBY. Worst drawdown: RSBY -23.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RSBY and VOO?
RSBY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSBY and VOO?
RSBY and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSBY or VOO?
RSBY yields 1.78% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RSBY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.