RVER vs VTI
Trenchless Fund ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVER | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $150M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.16% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.31% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | River1 Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
RVER vs VTI Performance
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) is a ETF from River1 Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVER returned +17.31% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RVER is up 16.16% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVER has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.2% for RVER and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVER charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVER currently yields 1.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RVER and VTI share 13 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVER or VTI?
RVER has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVER or VTI?
Over the past year RVER returned +17.31% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RVER annualized +17.47% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVER or VTI?
RVER has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RVER -26.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RVER and VTI?
RVER and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RVER and VTI?
RVER and VTI share 13 common holdings with a 11.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVER or VTI?
RVER yields 1.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RVER currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.