RVER vs VTI
Trenchless Fund ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RVER or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVER | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $123M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +8.20% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.28% | +12.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $13,658 | $14,958Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.6% | 34.6%Best |
| Fund Family | River1 Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (2.6 years).
RVER vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
RVER vs VTI Performance
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) is an ETF from River1 Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVER returned +6.28% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, RVER is up 8.20% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVER has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 11.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.2% for RVER and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVER charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVER currently yields 1.59% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.2% of RVER's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 13.5% of VTI's money is in holdings RVER also owns.
Most of RVER is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
19 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in RVER and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 44 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,110 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RVER (83.4% of the fund), and 1 for RVER that do not appear in VTI (4.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RVER | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.52% | 7.13% | 0.39% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.04% | 2.28% | 6.76% |
| IBRXImmunitybio Inc | 7.28% | 0.01% | 7.27% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.88% | 2.18% | 2.70% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 6.78% | 0.02% | 6.76% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 6.70% | 0.06% | 6.64% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 6.22% | 0.22% | 6.00% |
| FSLRFirst Solar Inc | 5.65% | 0.02% | 5.63% |
| BEBLOOM ENERGY CORP | 5.30% | 0.11% | 5.19% |
| SOFISofi Technologies Inc | 5.20% | 0.03% | 5.17% |
95.2% of RVER is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVER or VTI?
RVER has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RVER or VTI?
Over the past year RVER returned +6.28% vs +12.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RVER or VTI?
RVER has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 11.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RVER -26.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RVER and VTI?
RVER and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RVER and VTI?
95.2% of RVER's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 13.5% of VTI's is in holdings RVER also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in RVER and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVER or VTI?
RVER yields 1.59% while VTI yields 1.06%, so RVER currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RVER?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.