RVER vs VOO
Trenchless Fund ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVER | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $150M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.57% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.86% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.04% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | River1 Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RVER vs VOO Performance
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) is a ETF from River1 Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVER returned +16.04% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, RVER is up 14.86% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVER has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.2% for RVER and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVER charges 0.66% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVER currently yields 1.57% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RVER and VOO share 9 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVER or VOO?
RVER has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVER or VOO?
Over the past year RVER returned +16.04% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RVER annualized +16.93% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVER or VOO?
RVER has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RVER -26.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RVER and VOO?
RVER and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RVER and VOO?
RVER and VOO share 9 common holdings with a 12.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVER or VOO?
RVER yields 1.57% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RVER currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.