RVER vs VXUS
Trenchless Fund ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVER | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $150M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.57% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.69% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.06% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | River1 Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RVER vs VXUS Performance
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) is a ETF from River1 Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVER returned +21.06% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, RVER is up 18.69% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVER has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.2% for RVER and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVER charges 0.66% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $5 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVER currently yields 1.57% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RVER and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7885 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVER or VXUS?
RVER has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVER or VXUS?
Over the past year RVER returned +21.06% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RVER annualized +18.70% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVER or VXUS?
RVER has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RVER -26.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RVER and VXUS?
RVER and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RVER and VXUS?
RVER and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7885 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVER or VXUS?
RVER yields 1.57% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.