SAGP vs VTI
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAGP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $81M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.17% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.01% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.63% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.42% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Strategas Asset Management, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
SAGP vs VTI Performance
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF (SAGP) is a ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SAGP returned +17.63% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SAGP is up 12.01% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SAGP compounded at +17.42% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, SAGP has the edge at +11.00% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.5% for SAGP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for SAGP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SAGP charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SAGP currently yields 3.17% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SAGP and VTI share 60 holdings out of 2827 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SAGP or VTI?
SAGP has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SAGP or VTI?
Over the past year SAGP returned +17.63% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SAGP annualized +11.00% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SAGP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.5% for SAGP. Worst drawdown: SAGP -22.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SAGP and VTI?
SAGP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SAGP and VTI?
SAGP and VTI share 60 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2827 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SAGP or VTI?
SAGP yields 3.17% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SAGP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.