SCHD vs TKNQ
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TKNQ?
Large Cap Value against Multi Alternative.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. TKNQ is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TKNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $112.2B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 103 | 61 |
| YTD Return | +27.56%Best | -0.19% |
| 1Y Return | +30.29% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.37% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5% | 34.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Dec 23, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs TKNQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs TKNQ Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF (TKNQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Year to date, SCHD is up 27.56% versus a loss of 0.19% for TKNQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TKNQ charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $69 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.00% for TKNQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 60 in TKNQ, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 60 in TKNQ, against full books of 103 and 61.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 41 positions for TKNQ that do not appear in our book for SCHD (73.4% of the fund), and 99 for SCHD that do not appear in TKNQ (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and TKNQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TKNQ?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TKNQ charges 0.69%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TKNQ?
SCHD yields 3.13% while TKNQ yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TKNQ better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. TKNQ is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.