IVV vs TKNQ

IVV vs TKNQ

Which is better, IVV or TKNQ?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTKNQ
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.69%
AUM$850.0B$1M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.00%
Holdings1,018133
YTD Return+12.12%Best-13.12%
1Y Return+12.53%Best-12.20%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.54%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.93%-
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Amplify ETFs
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 23, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

IVV vs TKNQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs TKNQ Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF (TKNQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% while TKNQ returned -12.20%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.12% versus a loss of 13.12% for TKNQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TKNQ charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for TKNQ.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in TKNQ13.6%

At least 13.6% of IVV's money is in holdings TKNQ also owns.

Stated as a floor: for TKNQ, our book for it covers 61.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

IVV and TKNQ share little of their money.

23 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 62 in TKNQ, against full books of 1,018 and 133.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TKNQDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.95%0.96%4.99%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.06%0.83%2.23%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.34%0.79%0.55%
BLKBlackrock Inc Cl A Com0.23%0.99%0.76%
BACBank of America Corp.: Financials0.50%0.66%0.16%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.0.37%0.73%0.36%
IBMIbm0.32%0.76%0.44%
AXPAmerican Express Co.0.24%0.83%0.59%
CCitigroup Inc.0.31%0.73%0.42%
CMECme Group Inc.0.15%0.85%0.70%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and TKNQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVTKNQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TKNQ?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TKNQ charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or TKNQ?

Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% vs -12.20% for TKNQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TKNQ?

At least 13.6% of IVV's money is in holdings TKNQ also owns. Our book for TKNQ is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 62 in TKNQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TKNQ?

IVV yields 1.09% while TKNQ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TKNQ better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.