SCOW vs SPY
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCOW | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $2M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +19.61% | +13.17% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.37% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2025 | Jan 22, 1993 |
SCOW vs SPY Performance
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SCOW returned +17.37% while SPY returned +21.53%. Year to date, SCOW is up 19.61% versus a gain of 13.17% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.3% for SCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for SCOW and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCOW charges 0.59% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $9 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCOW currently yields 0.36% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
SCOW and SPY share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCOW or SPY?
SCOW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCOW or SPY?
Over the past year SCOW returned +17.37% vs +21.53% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCOW or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.3% for SCOW. Worst drawdown: SCOW -10.1% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both SCOW and SPY?
SCOW and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCOW and SPY?
SCOW and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCOW or SPY?
SCOW yields 0.36% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.