SCOW vs VTI
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SCOW or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCOW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 81 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +16.11%Best | +12.95% |
| 1Y Return | +12.86% | +19.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,351 | $11,874Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2025 to Sep 8, 2026 (1 years).
SCOW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
SCOW vs VTI Performance
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCOW returned +12.86% while VTI returned +19.17%. Year to date, SCOW is up 16.11% versus a gain of 12.95% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 12.0% for SCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for SCOW and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCOW charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCOW currently yields 0.36% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 60.6% of SCOW's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
51 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in SCOW and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 81 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCOW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETSYEtsy Inc | 4.85% | 0.00% | 4.85% |
| MTCHMatch Group Inc. | 3.84% | 0.01% | 3.83% |
| MKTXMarketaxess Holdings Inc?.? | 3.45% | 0.00% | 3.45% |
| BFHBread Financial Holdings, Inc. | 3.32% | 0.00% | 3.32% |
| PAYCPaycom Software | 3.20% | 0.00% | 3.20% |
| BOXBox Inc | 2.98% | 0.00% | 2.98% |
| NMIHNmi Holdings Inc. | 2.02% | 0.00% | 2.02% |
| ZWSZurn Water Solutions Corporation | 1.90% | 0.01% | 1.89% |
| EXTRExtreme Networks, Inc. | 1.73% | 0.00% | 1.73% |
| ADEAAdeia Inc_None_0 | 1.67% | 0.00% | 1.67% |
60.6% of SCOW is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCOW or VTI?
SCOW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCOW or VTI?
Over the past year SCOW returned +12.86% vs +19.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SCOW annualized +13.51% vs +18.74% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCOW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 12.0% for SCOW. Worst drawdown: SCOW -10.1% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both SCOW and VTI?
SCOW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCOW and VTI?
At least 60.6% of SCOW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 51 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in SCOW and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCOW or VTI?
SCOW yields 0.36% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SCOW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.