SCOW vs VOO
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCOW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.11% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.88% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SCOW vs VOO Performance
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCOW returned +16.88% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, SCOW is up 19.11% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.3% for SCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for SCOW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCOW charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCOW currently yields 0.36% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SCOW and VOO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCOW or VOO?
SCOW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCOW or VOO?
Over the past year SCOW returned +16.88% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCOW or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.3% for SCOW. Worst drawdown: SCOW -10.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SCOW and VOO?
SCOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCOW and VOO?
SCOW and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCOW or VOO?
SCOW yields 0.36% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.