SCOW vs VOO
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SCOW or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCOW | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 81 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.03%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +7.55% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,139 | $11,989Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.4% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.1 years).
SCOW vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
SCOW vs VOO Performance
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCOW returned +7.55% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, SCOW is up 13.03% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 12.8% for SCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for SCOW and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCOW charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCOW currently yields 0.36% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 80 holdings in SCOW and 494 in VOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in SCOW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 81 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SCOW (99.2% of the fund), and 78 for SCOW that do not appear in VOO (98.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCOW and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCOW or VOO?
SCOW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCOW or VOO?
Over the past year SCOW returned +7.55% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SCOW annualized +10.30% vs +17.93% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCOW or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 12.8% for SCOW. Worst drawdown: SCOW -10.1% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both SCOW and VOO?
SCOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCOW or VOO?
SCOW yields 0.36% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SCOW?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.