SDOG vs VOO
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SDOG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SDOG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.33% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +23.22% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.18% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.90% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.50% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SDOG vs VOO Performance
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SDOG returned +29.18% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, SDOG is up 23.22% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, SDOG compounded at +18.90% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.50% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.4% for SDOG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SDOG charges 0.36% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDOG currently yields 3.33% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SDOG and VOO share 49 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SDOG or VOO?
SDOG has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SDOG or VOO?
Over the past year SDOG returned +29.18% vs +20.92% for VOO, so SDOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), SDOG annualized +9.48% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SDOG or VOO?
SDOG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SDOG -46.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SDOG and VOO?
SDOG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SDOG and VOO?
SDOG and VOO share 49 common holdings with a 6.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SDOG or VOO?
SDOG yields 3.33% while VOO yields 1.08%, so SDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.