SECT vs ZIG
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Which is better, SECT or ZIG?
SECT has been ahead.
SECT has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ZIG is less concentrated, with 34.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SECT | ZIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $2.9B | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.70% |
| Holdings | 19 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +10.58%Best | +5.85% |
| 1Y Return | +14.28%Best | +7.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.91%Best | +10.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.81%Best | +7.65% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9%Best | 20.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.1% | -37.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,474Best | $14,457 |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 34.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC | Acquirers Funds, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2017 | May 14, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.4 years).
SECT vs ZIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
SECT vs ZIG Performance
Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is an ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is an ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year SECT returned +14.28% while ZIG returned +7.60%. Year to date, SECT is up 10.58% versus a gain of 5.85% for ZIG.
Over three years, SECT compounded at +18.91% per year against +10.04% for ZIG; over five years the annualized figures are +11.81% and +7.65% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SECT has the edge at +14.35% annualized vs +7.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 15.9% for SECT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.1% for SECT and -37.1% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SECT charges 0.69% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $75 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SECT currently yields 0.69% against 1.70% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 10 holdings in SECT and 32 in ZIG, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in SECT and 32 in ZIG, against full books of 19 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 32 positions for ZIG that do not appear in our book for SECT (100.0% of the fund), and 10 for SECT that do not appear in ZIG (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SECT and ZIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SECT or ZIG?
SECT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while ZIG charges 0.75%. SECT is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SECT or ZIG?
Over the past year SECT returned +14.28% vs +7.60% for ZIG, so SECT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SECT annualized +14.35% vs +7.03% for ZIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SECT or ZIG?
ZIG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 15.9% for SECT. Worst drawdown: SECT -38.1% vs ZIG -37.1%.
Should I hold both SECT and ZIG?
SECT and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SECT or ZIG?
SECT yields 0.69% while ZIG yields 1.70%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZIG better than SECT?
SECT has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ZIG is less concentrated, with 34.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.