SIL vs VOO
Global X Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SIL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.8B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.03% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +68.47% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +54.82% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.99% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SIL vs VOO Performance
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SIL returned +68.47% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, SIL is up 8.03% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, SIL compounded at +54.82% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +18.99% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.0% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.4% for SIL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SIL charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIL currently yields 1.38% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SIL and VOO share 0 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SIL or VOO?
SIL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SIL or VOO?
Over the past year SIL returned +68.47% vs +21.79% for VOO, so SIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SIL annualized +4.82% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SIL or VOO?
SIL has been the more volatile fund at 40.0% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SIL -83.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SIL and VOO?
SIL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SIL and VOO?
SIL and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SIL or VOO?
SIL yields 1.38% while VOO yields 1.08%, so SIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.