SIVR vs SLV

SIVR vs SLV

Which is better, SIVR or SLV?

Nearly the same fund. SIVR costs less.

SIVR has a lower expense ratio. SIVR led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SLV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00.

Lower Fees: SIVRHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSIVRSLV
Expense Ratio0.30%Best0.50%
AUM$4.3B$30.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings21
YTD Return-17.22%Best-17.34%
1Y Return+14.97%+15.00%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+38.06%Best+37.81%
5Y Return (annualized)+21.28%Best+21.03%
Volatility (annualized)31.9%Tie31.9%Tie
Max Drawdown-75.8%Best-76.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$26,239Best$25,970
Fund FamilyAberdeeniShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryCommodityCommodity
StyleSilverSilver
InceptionJul 24, 2009Apr 21, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 24, 2009 to Oct 12, 2026 (17.2 years).

SIVR vs SLV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.2 years both funds cover.

Compare SIVR against instead:SIVR vs SPYSIVR vs QQQSIVR vs VOOSIVR vs VTISLV against:SLV vs VXUS

SIVR vs SLV Performance

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is an ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year SIVR returned +14.97% while SLV returned +15.00%. Year to date, SIVR is down 17.22% versus a loss of 17.34% for SLV.

Over three years, SIVR compounded at +38.06% per year against +37.81% for SLV; over five years the annualized figures are +21.28% and +21.03% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, SIVR has the edge at +8.55% annualized vs +8.35%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SIVR and SLV have been equally volatile, both at 31.9% annualized.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.8% for SIVR and -76.3% for SLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SIVR charges 0.30% per year while SLV charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $50 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIVR currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for SLV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SIVR and SLV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SIVRSLV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SIVR or SLV?

SIVR has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SLV charges 0.50%. SIVR is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SIVR or SLV?

Over the past year SIVR returned +14.97% vs +15.00% for SLV, so SLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SIVR annualized +8.55% vs +8.35% for SLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SIVR or SLV?

SIVR and SLV have been equally volatile, both at 31.9% annualized. Worst drawdown: SIVR -75.8% vs SLV -76.3%.

Should I hold both SIVR and SLV?

SIVR and SLV have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SIVR or SLV?

SIVR yields 0.00% while SLV yields 0.00%, so SLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SLV better than SIVR?

SIVR has a lower expense ratio. SIVR led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SLV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.