SKYU vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SKYU delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SKYU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +44.08% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +60.50% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.13% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.28% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 52.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 19, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
SKYU vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SKYU returned +60.50% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SKYU is up 44.08% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SKYU compounded at +44.13% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.28% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SKYU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for SKYU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SKYU charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SKYU currently yields 0.74% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SKYU and VTI share 53 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SKYU or VTI?
SKYU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SKYU or VTI?
Over the past year SKYU returned +60.50% vs +22.35% for VTI, so SKYU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), SKYU annualized +4.15% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SKYU or VTI?
SKYU has been the more volatile fund at 52.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SKYU -83.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SKYU and VTI?
SKYU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SKYU and VTI?
SKYU and VTI share 53 common holdings with a 10.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SKYU or VTI?
SKYU yields 0.74% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.