SKYY vs VTI

SKYY vs VTI

Which is better, SKYY or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SKYY led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSKYYVTI
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$3.3B$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings1283,543
YTD Return+22.57%Best+11.65%
1Y Return+16.27%+17.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+24.26%Best+20.35%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.56%+11.72%Best
Volatility (annualized)21.6%14.8%Best
Max Drawdown-53.2%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$14,396$17,404Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 6, 2011May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 6, 2011 to Sep 10, 2026 (15.2 years).

SKYY vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.2 years both funds cover.

SKYY vs VTI Performance

First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SKYY returned +16.27% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, SKYY is up 22.57% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Over three years, SKYY compounded at +24.26% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.56% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SKYY has the edge at +14.71% annualized vs +12.27%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SKYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.2% for SKYY and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SKYY charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SKYY currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

SKYY already in VTI89.4%

At least 89.4% of SKYY's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of SKYY is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, SKYY as of Sep 1, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

54 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in SKYY and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 128 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SKYYWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.60%3.81%0.21%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.06%3.17%0.11%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0012.85%2.88%0.03%
NTNXNutanix Inc4.20%0.02%4.18%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock3.92%0.25%3.67%
PSTGPure Storage Inc3.73%0.03%3.70%
MDBMongodb, Inc.3.59%0.04%3.55%
TEAM:AUAtlassian Corp Plc2.88%0.02%2.86%
IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.2.51%0.36%2.15%
NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup)2.68%0.11%2.57%

89.4% of SKYY is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SKYYVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SKYY or VTI?

SKYY has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SKYY or VTI?

Over the past year SKYY returned +16.27% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SKYY annualized +14.71% vs +12.27% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SKYY or VTI?

SKYY has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SKYY -53.2% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both SKYY and VTI?

SKYY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between SKYY and VTI?

At least 89.4% of SKYY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 54 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in SKYY and 2,787 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, SKYY or VTI?

SKYY yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SKYY?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SKYY led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.