SKYY vs VTI
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SKYY delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SKYY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.76% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.78% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.82% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.96% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
SKYY vs VTI Performance
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SKYY returned +33.78% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, SKYY is up 24.76% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, SKYY compounded at +27.82% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.96% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SKYY has the edge at +14.91% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SKYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.2% for SKYY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SKYY charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SKYY currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SKYY and VTI share 54 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SKYY or VTI?
SKYY has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SKYY or VTI?
Over the past year SKYY returned +33.78% vs +21.39% for VTI, so SKYY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SKYY annualized +14.91% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SKYY or VTI?
SKYY has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SKYY -53.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SKYY and VTI?
SKYY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SKYY and VTI?
SKYY and VTI share 54 common holdings with a 13.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SKYY or VTI?
SKYY yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.