SMAP vs VTI
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SMAP or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. SMAP is less concentrated, with 32.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMAP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $10,833 | $13,312Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.8%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 106 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. SMAP has data through Jun 4, 2026 and VTI through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2024 to Jun 4, 2026 (1.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 13.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.2% for SMAP and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMAP charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMAP currently yields 0.42% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.1% of SMAP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.0% of VTI's money is in holdings SMAP also owns.
Most of SMAP is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, SMAP as of Apr 30, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
53 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in SMAP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 57 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,106 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SMAP (96.4% of the fund), and 1 for SMAP that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SMAP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 4.85% | 0.09% | 4.76% |
| CASYCaseys General | 3.69% | 0.04% | 3.65% |
| MKSIMks Instruments Inc | 3.56% | 0.03% | 3.53% |
| WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services Inc | 3.55% | 0.03% | 3.52% |
| CWCurtiss-wright Corp | 3.12% | 0.04% | 3.08% |
| SFStifel Finl Corp | 2.99% | 0.02% | 2.97% |
| WSOWatsco Inc | 2.89% | 0.02% | 2.87% |
| STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. | 2.83% | 0.05% | 2.78% |
| MTDRMatador Resources Co | 2.79% | 0.01% | 2.78% |
| EXPEagle Materials Inc | 2.50% | 0.01% | 2.49% |
97.1% of SMAP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMAP or VTI?
SMAP has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, SMAP or VTI?
SMAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 13.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SMAP -24.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SMAP and VTI?
SMAP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SMAP and VTI?
97.1% of SMAP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.0% of VTI's is in holdings SMAP also owns. They hold 53 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in SMAP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMAP or VTI?
SMAP yields 0.42% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SMAP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. SMAP is less concentrated, with 32.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.