SMAP vs VTI
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMAP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.50% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.14% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SMAP vs VTI Performance
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMAP returned +12.14% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, SMAP is up 6.50% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.0% for SMAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.2% for SMAP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMAP charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMAP currently yields 0.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SMAP and VTI share 36 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMAP or VTI?
SMAP has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SMAP or VTI?
Over the past year SMAP returned +12.14% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SMAP annualized +5.13% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SMAP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.0% for SMAP. Worst drawdown: SMAP -24.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SMAP and VTI?
SMAP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SMAP and VTI?
SMAP and VTI share 36 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMAP or VTI?
SMAP yields 0.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.